August 13, 2026
On time
There was a time not too long ago when my friends asked each other how they visualized time. I don’t really think about time too much, so my answer was practical: my mind’s eye saw an abstraction of the Google Calendar UI. I imagine my answer then was disappointing. But now that I’ve experienced an abundance of time, trying to squeeze the sausage of the past towards “art making” in the present, I see time as a ribbon that can be folded and shaped in 2D space. Because that’s the simplest space for me, a flat visual artist, to think about. My attention is a movable lens that focuses on specific parts of the ribbon. Recently, working on autofiction projects has meant wrangling and folding the ribbon in new ways, so seemingly unconnected events all fit under the glass and I may thread a needle through their overlap.
I’m against Substack as a corporation (hence my self-hosted blog), but I did subscribe to one recently, which is that of one of my favorite authors, Elif Batuman. I loved reading The Idiot sometime during early grad school, where my reaction was “Selin is me for real.” I didn’t think about Elif much until, leafing through a signed copy (!) of The Possessed at Green Apple Books, I learned she had dropped out of her Stanford Comp Lit PhD and only returned after she fell while running across the Golden Gate Bridge to get health insurance. In my last year of grad school, while she was visiting to promote The Idiot’s sequel Either/Or, I asked her if she thought Stanford was a libertarian place (a source of much of my pain), and she candidly replied that she didn’t have thoughts like that at the time. I like that she is frank about her limitations and frank about how so much of her writing is to make sense of events in her life that happened twenty years ago.
A recent exercise in The Artist’s Way made me think about the child I was twenty years ago, and I was kind of appalled to find out that I couldn’t remember. Like, I remembered things that happened to me as kid, but I couldn’t tell you about my personality. But then I polled my Twitter followers and they all could. Alzheimer’s runs in my family. Is this it?
The second footnote is that do you even experience yourself as discrete, or continual, or some combination of both? Like, was I that fundamentally different as a child? High school and college felt really different but maybe it was more environment and my confidence in relating to others. But I think the larger point is I’m taking a Žižekian view of the self in that self-identity doesn’t matter and the end goal of “self improvement/introspection” is to see yourself as part of a whole and inspire collective action.
In a post about repetition, about continually bringing the past to many different presents, she writes:
“Part of the work of a novel is to wrench a chunk of time out of the flow of history and of your personal life, so you can analyze it and see what’s actually going on—so you can put it into words. […] In the past months of working with familiar chunks of material and not leaving the house, I’m finding that it gets easier to hold bigger chunks in mind long enough to manipulate them—and then to compare different manipulations.” (via Vital Spark Recovery Program)
Reading this was so fascinating to me—I talk about the same thing all the time, just with using different language (i.e. HCI jargon) like “distributed cognition.” I hadn’t put much thought into time as an integral creative material before—mainly because the things I did make were in contained bursts. But time has been inescapable.
One of my personal sabbatical projects is an autofiction graphic novel about, among other things,Other things mostly being power. Institutional power, how tech/AI redistributes power, how workers must constantly push for the next thing lest they slow down and reflect and realize how messed up it all is, how the big winner in all of this technology development is the military and state surveillance, etc. being at Stanford during the beginnings of the “AI hype.” I rarely think about the past, let alone purposefully manipulate its shape to fit what may be an exciting narrative or concretely convey critical theory.At the Undone CS conference, I realized that one way to get conversations of the AI power grab outside of academia is through “pop culture,” or creating a comic with a plot so good young CS majors have no choice but to confront their sociotechnical realities.
Last post, I said that I wanted to experience the life of a “full time artist.” And what I’ve found is that it’s actually been extremely lonely. I’m not good at living in my own head! As someone whose default mode is “extroverted intuition”I feel like the “dominant functions” are more Myers-Briggs than Jungian, and thus are a negative cultural signifier, e.g., techies and rationalists are into the reductive categorization of MBTI while true “humanists” take a Jungian lens. (e.g., I talk about my experiences with others, usually as I experience them, to process them), looking inward to synthesize whatever message I wanted to convey, or whatever action I thought would make for a meaningful story, has been a new challenge. It’s helpful to be reassured by Elif’s posts, as someone who is reticent/afraid to take the time to think about prior events because I don’t want to be so busy documenting and reflecting on the past that I miss living in the present.
This is a reductive binary, but I feel like people engage in making autofiction to either process something that has happened to them, or to try to explain why their experience was the way it was, towards greater social change. At the end of graduate school, I would have been the former, but my tried and true way of processing trauma is to just live life and eventually forget. Becoming preoccupied with other things (e.g., my job) made me forget my artistic impulses. But in the present day, as everyone (again) keeps on talking to me about AI, I have migrated to the second camp. I’ve been telling myself it’s my slow science project, Isabelle Stengers, Another Science is Possible. Even though drawing comics is not “science” in a methodological sense. but I do feel some time pressure since the Project of AI Vertesi et al., Reckoning with the Political Economy of AI: Avoiding Decoys in Pursuit of Accountability. We read this in my summer research group, as well as the epilogue of Karen Hao's Empire of AI, where one of my students said “project” was a better name than “empire” because it felt more tractable to challenge. shows no signs of slowing down and I want to reach these impressionable young minds before the high TC (total comp) packages do. One line I’m finding challenging to navigate is that of exposing a system without overly moralizing my values. Elif also writes that the point of art is maybe to just have a great aesthetic experience and you should trust your readers to be smart enough to draw their own conclusions. But I can’t help but want to “make change” in the way HCI researchers spell out “design imperatives” or whatever. (But I do think a larger part of this is to convince myself that this silly graphic novel will indeed make change, in the way I need to justify how I spend my time to myself constantly, because of my own learned behaviors in the system I’m trying to unveil.)


